La Crosse Plow Co. v. Pagenstecher
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska; Thomas C. Munger, Judge. Action by Louis Pagenstecher against the La Crosse Plow Company, a corporation. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, Circuit Judge.
Defendant in error, plaintiff below, sued the Plow Company to recover commissions claimed to be due him under a written contract as sales agent. 'The commissions sued for were claimed on sales made to one Howard. They consisted of two items. The first item, of $6,621.09, was for sales for which notes were given by Howard. The second item, of $2,105, was for implements sold to Howard, but taken back by the Plow Company. The contract provided that one-half of the commission should be payable “on receipt of and acceptance of order, balance when accounts are paid or settled…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Empire State Cattle Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Minahan v. Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- Empire State Cattle Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Catlett v. Chestnut, as Exr.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Harris v. BriggsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Mayes v. United States Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- United States v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Michigan Copper & Brass Co. v. Chicago Screw Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.