Legal Opinion
Edward Joseph Harding v. David Galceran Terry Gingerich Lawrence Moser James D. Chisim
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 16, 1989No. 88-6484PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
This ease involves a dispute between Edward Joseph Harding and Sheriffs deputies David Galceran and Ed Teel (the “Deputies”) of the San Dimas Sheriffs substation, Los Angeles, California. The district court found that Harding’s claims against the Deputies were barred by the statute of limitations. Because we find that the statute of limitations was tolled, we reverse.
I
On October 10, 1984, Harding went to the San Dimas Sheriffs substation to pick up a friend who had been arrested. Harding argued with the Deputies at the substation. The Deputies asked Harding to leave and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Raymond Trimble v. City of Santa RosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Robert R. Cervantes v. City of San Diego San Diego Police Department Dennis Sesma Officer Carlos Garcia Les Wardwell Officer Eugene BojorquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Sheldon Lockett v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Schmidlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Silva v. CrainCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.