Legal Opinion
Scott v. Scott
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided March 19, 1925PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
We have concluded that the decree here under review should be affirmed.
The reasons which justify this conclusion are sufficiently expressed by the Honorable William H. Barks-dale, who decided the ease in the trial court, whose-opinion we adopt. It follows:
“The original bill in this case was filed in the-Circuit *34Court of Lynchburg on the 17th. day of March, 1923, by Nellie K. Scott against Marvin R. Scott, and had for its object the setting aside and annulment of a decree of divorce a mensa et ihoro, granted the said Marvin R. Scott by said court on the' 11th day of December, 1922, on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lane Bros. & Co. v. BausermanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
- Powers v. HowardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Valz v. CoinerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Peatross v. GraySupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
- Sauls v. Thomas Andrews & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Craddock's Administrator v. Craddock's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
- Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.