Legal Opinion

Routh v. Spencer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1868PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from tho Wayne Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtGresory, J.

This was a proceeding supplementary to execution, commenced by tho appellees against the appellants, Routh, Routh, Canady, and Julian, the object of which was to reach the amount of two notes executed by Canady to Jeremiah T. B. Routh, against whom the appellees had a jugdment, the notes being in the hands of Julian, as attorney for Routh.

Canady and Julian answered, admitting tho indebtedness, and the possession in the latter of tho notes.

One Sanford, who was not a party, but who asked to he made, such, joined in a cross-complaint with the administrator of Joseph Routh (who was a party), in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coffin v. McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Routh v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API