Legal Opinion
Routh v. Spencer
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1871PublishedCited by 9 opinions
APPEAL from the Wayne'Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.
The action of the court in sustaining a demurrer to the complaint is assigned for error, and this presents the only question in the case. The material facts stated in the complaint are these:
“Jeremiah S. B. Routh was indebted to Thomas B. Stan*394ford, in the sum of two hundred and thirty-four dollars and thirty-seven cents, for which he gave his note, with Joseph Routh, the decedent, as his surety; that after the death of Joseph Routh, the said Stanford filed the said note against his estate, and an allowance was made by the administrator in the sum of three hundred and thirty-four dollars and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lewis v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Sparks v. State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
- Hubble v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Gallion v. M'CaslinIndiana Supreme Court · 1820
- Cooke v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Scranton v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Splahn v. GillespieIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- United States Saving Fund & Investment Co. v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Rooker v. RookerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Matter of US Marketing Concepts, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.