Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. . Moody

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1ConcurrenceClark, C. J.

Defendant was convicted and appealed. The defendant was indicted for the seduction of an innocent and virtuous woman under a promise of marriage. Revisal, sec. 3354.

The statute provides that the "unsupported testimony" of the woman shall not be sufficient to convict.

There are three essential elements of this crime: first, the seduction; second, the innocence and virtuousness of the woman; third, the promise of marriage inducing consent of the woman to the sexual act. S. v. Pace,159 N.C. 462; S. v. Cline, 170 N.C. 751. The prosecutrix testified to the defendant's promise of marriage; that she…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Ande v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
  3. Whatley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. State v. . HortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. State v. CurranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. State v. . McDadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. State v. . PatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API