Legal Opinion
KG Urban Enterprises, LLC v. Patrick
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 6, 2013No. Civil No. 11-12070-NMGPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff challenges a provision of an Act Establishing Expanded Gaming in the Commonwealth, 2011 Mass. Acts eh. 194 (“the Gaming Act”), that it alleges unconstitutionally prevents it from competing for a commercial gaming license in southeastern Massachusetts. Pending before the Court are competing motions to intervene filed by the two federally recognized Indian tribes residing in southeastern Massachusetts, as well as two conditional motions to intervene filed by related parties.
I. Background
In February, 2012, the Court declined to find the Gaming…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carcieri v. SalazarSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- KG Urban Enterprises, LLC v. PatrickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Picciotto v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Jiménez v. Rodríguez-PagánCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- John Doe v. Town of Lisbon, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
- COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS v. U.S. Dept. of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- Doe v. Lisbon, NH, Town ofDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
- LOWE v. MILLSDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021