Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Henderson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 22, 1940No. 28035PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. The motion to dismiss the writ of error is denied.

2. “Where the court, on demurrer, holds that the transaction upon which a recovery is sought does not, as it is alleged'iri the petition, constitute a cause of action, and dismisses the suit on this ground, the judgment operates as, a res adjudicaba, and bars a subsequent suit between the parties on the same transaction, though in the.first case the facts were untruly or improperly stated, and if they had been truly and prroperly stated, a cause of action would have' been disclosed.” (Italics ours.) Wolfe v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. DeLoach v. Georgia Coast & Piedmont RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Woods v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Hoffman v. SummerfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  5. Sudderth v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burke v. GrubbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Smith v. Bank of AcworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc. v. TylerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API