Legal Opinion

Woods v. Travelers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 8, 1936No. 25280PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “Under the doctrine of res judicata, whenever there has been a judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction in a former litigation between the same parties, based upon the same cause of action as a pending litigation, the litigants are bound to the extent of all matters put in issue or which under the rules of law might have been put in issue by the pleadings in the previous litigation. . . A somewhat different rule applies in regard to the doctrine of estoppel by judgment, since the latter doctrine has reference to previous litigation between the same parties based upon a different cause…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Perry v. McLendonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  2. Farmer v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  3. Sellers v. PageSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Smith v. HornsbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  5. Wolfe v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Spence v. ErwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Lewis v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Milton v. MiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Wilson v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Smith v. BirdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API