Legal Opinion
Allied Construction Industries v. City of Cincinnati
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 4, 2018No. 16-4248/4249PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
The City of Cincinnati (“City”) and Laborers International Union of North America, Local 265 (“the Union”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Allied Construction Industries (“Allied Construction”), and the denial of the City’s and the Union’s motions for summary judgment. The district court held that three City ordinance provisions (“the Ordinance”) concerning bidder specifications for certain City projects were preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). We hold that the City was acting as a market participant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Lodge 76, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Building & Construction Trades Council of the Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders & Contractors of Massachusetts/Rhode Island, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- City of Columbus v. Ours Garage & Wrecker Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Johnson v. Rancho Santiago Community College DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- John Schickel v. Craig DilgerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Airlines For America v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- NetChoice, LLC v. David YostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026