Legal Opinion
In re Eastham
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided July 8, 1931No. 1179PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
The bankrupt having duly made his application for discharge, creditors the City Investment Company, Citizens’ State Bank of Houston, Huntsville State Bank, and Gibbs Bros. & Co. filed specifications in objection thereto.
The specifications of the City Investment Company alleged the making of false statements for the purpose of securing, and the securing thereon of, advances of money to the bankrupt. These statements were alleged to have been made on March 16, 1925, January 7, 1926, and January 22, 1924. It was alleged as to them that the statements were false as to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Morimura, Arai & Co. v. TabackSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Gerdes v. LustgartenSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Levy v. Industrial Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cunningham v. Elco Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- In Re SlohmDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- Rutland Savings Bank v. Norton (In Re Norton)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1980
- Klecka v. Shuttles Bros. & Lewis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- In re JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.