Legal Opinion

McGladrey & Pullen, L.L.P. v. Shrader

Rockingham County Circuit Court

Decided August 11, 2003No. Case No. CH02-19119PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge John j. McGrath, Jr.

These matters are before the Court on Defendant Shrader’s demurrer challenging the legal sufficiency of all five counts of the Plaintiffs’ Bill of Complaint. Plaintiffs seek to enjoin Defendant from soliciting Plaintiffs’ clients, an accounting for lost income, and $550,000.00 in compensatory and liquidated damages, and $350,000.00 in punitive damages.

It is well established, in ruling on a demurrer, that the Court must accept as true all well pleaded facts and the reasonable inferences from such facts. The rule was most recently re-stated by the Supreme Court in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Ward's Equipment, Inc. v. New Holland North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  3. Duggin v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  4. Williams v. Dominion Technology Partners, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  5. Fox v. DeeseSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wright v. Eli Lilly & Co.Portsmouth County Circuit Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API