Legal Opinion

Clarkston v. Bridge

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 20, 1975No. 73-4927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

On November 13,1973, Chiquita Clarkston, respondent herein and a resident of the state of Washington, filed a complaint in the Superior Court of the state of Washington for Kitsap County, pursuant to the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), ORS ch 110, praying that Michael Bridge, appellant herein, be ordered to pay for the support of one Brandie Jean Lindsey, her minor daughter. In accordance with the Act, the complaint and accompanying certificate and order were forwarded to the Lane County Circuit Court. On November 29, 1973, appellant was served, pursuant to statute,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wadsworth v. BrighamOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. City of Portland v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Nye v. District Court for County of AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  4. Aguilar v. HolcombSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  5. Lefler v. LeflerOregon Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clarkston v. BridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Clarkston v. BridgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API