Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Pennsylvania Casualty Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1936No. Appeal, 93PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

This is an appeal by defendant company from an order discharging rule to set aside service of summons in assumpsit. Plaintiff brought an action in Hew Jersey against defendant’s assured to recover for personal injuries suffered as a result of an automobile accident in that state. She recovered a judgment, and execution thereon was returned unsatisfied. She brought the present action in Philadelphia county against the defendant to recover directly from the defendant, in accordance with the terms of the policy issued to its assured. Defendant, whose main office is in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shambe v. Delaware Hudson R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Park Brothers & Co. v. Oil City Boiler WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Gilbert v. Lebanon Valley Street RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Jensen v. Philadelphia, Morton & Swarthmore Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  5. Lobb v. Pennsylvania Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walde v. Bowers Bat. Mfg. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Topyrik v. Russian Brotherhood Organization of U. S. A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Moustakas v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1954
  4. Krollick v. Husway, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1937
  5. Sullivan v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API