Legal Opinion
Caldwell v. City of San Francisco
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 25, 2021No. 4:12-cv-01892Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MAURICE CALDWELL, Case No. 12-cv-01892-DMR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 v. DISQUALIFY COUNSEL 10 CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 489 11 Defendants. 12 Defendants Kitt Crenshaw and City and County of San Francisco (“San Francisco”) filed a 13 motion to disqualify Plaintiff Maurice Caldwell’s counsel James Quadra. [Docket No. 489.] This 14 matter is appropriate for decision without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, 15 the motion is denied. 16 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 17 A. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Trone v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Eleanor Schiessle v. Donald E. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Maurice Caldwell v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.