Legal Opinion

United States v. Geer

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 8, 1920No. 2288Published

At Taw. Action by the United States against I. W. Geer and others, officers and agents of the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSON, District Judge.

In this action, brought by the United States attorney on behalf of the United States, to recover for alleged violations of the Hours of Service Act, the parties have agreed that the cause may be heard and determined by the court; a jury being waived. The parties have also, by stipulation filed, agreed upon the following facts, which are accordingly found by the court as facts in the case:(1) The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company is a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the slates of Pennsylvania, Indiana, and Illinois,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. LangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. United States v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  4. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  5. United States v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API