Legal Opinion

United States v. Jack Foster

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 11, 2006No. 05-1741PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted Jack Foster (Foster) of aiding and abetting attempted extortion, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. The district court 1 sentenced Foster to 36 months’ imprisonment. Foster appeals his conviction, ehal-lenging the constitutionality of the Hobbs Act, as applied, and in the alternative, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Foster and his longtime friend, Billy Freeman (Freeman), served as elected officials (aldermen) on the Pine Bluff, Arkansas, City Council (Council).…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Maryland v. WirtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. VigilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Darryl HouseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. John Larkin TrotterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Kasper Lamar Dobbs, United States of America v. Robert Wilson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. BaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API