Legal Opinion

Malden Redevelopment Authority v. Cetoute

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 24, 2013Published

1Opinion of the CourtSingh, J.

Plaintiff Malden Redevelopment Authority (“MRA”) brought this action for breach of contract after defendant Carine Cetoute (“Cetoute”) defaulted on payments under a promissory note. As Cetoute failed to answer the complaint, a default judgment was entered. Cetoute has appealed the trial court’s denial of her motion to vacate that judgment. Because we find no abuse of discretion, we affirm.

In January, 2009, Cetoute obtained a loan in the amount of $23,650.00 from the MRA to make improvements to her two-family house. In connection with the loan, Cetoute signed a promissory note, agreeing to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Berube v. McKesson Wine & Spirits Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  2. Gath v. M/A-Com, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. Clamp-All Corp. v. ForestaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  4. Hermanson v. SzafarowiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Keystone Freight Corp. v. Bartlett Consolidated, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API