Legal Opinion

Sixty-Eight Devonshire, Inc. v. Shapiro

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 4, 1964PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

This action of tort comes here on two bills of exceptions. The plaintiff’s bill arises out of the direetion of a verdict for the defendant on the plaintiff’s opening. The defendant’s bill arises out of the denial of his motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s bill.

Dependant’s Exceptions.

The plaintiff excepted to the action of the judge in directing a verdict for the defendant, and thereafter seasonably filed a bill of exceptions. At the expiration of three months from the time of filing, the plaintiff received a communication (dated January 3, 1964) from the clerk’s office entitled 1 ‘Notice Under…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Perkins v. PerkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Erickson v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Graustein v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Douglas v. WhittakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Prentiss v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Davignon v. ClemmeyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  2. Taygeta Corp. v. Varian Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Asiala v. City of FitchburgMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  4. Ahern v. WarnerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Doe v. Town of BlandfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API