Legal Opinion

McKann v. Town of Irvington

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 24, 1946PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment under review is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Colie in the Supreme Court, supplemented as follows:

The appellant concedes that Ordinance No. 1517, fixing salaries under R. S. 40:46-23, was not faulty in that it left a range within which a salary or wage might be moved without the formality of a further ordinance. The Supreme Court acquiesced in that view and, under the facts of the case, we concur. We note, however, that the range within which that movement is left to less formal determination than by ordinance is not so great as to…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shalita v. Township of WashingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  2. City of Ocean City v. SomervilleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  3. Nolan v. WitkowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. City of Creston v. Center Milk Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  5. Caruso v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API