Legal Opinion
Caruso v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1987PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*893OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur E. Blyn, J.
In this article 78 proceeding, petitioners Phil Caruso, as president of the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association of the City of New York (PBA), a public sector labor union, and the PBA seek a judgment declaring Local Law No. 13-A null and void.
Petitioners contend that Local Law No. 13-A, which is an amendment to section 440 of chapter 18 of the New York City Charter, was enacted by the New York City Council without authority, because it amends a Charter provision previously enacted by voter initiative in 1966.1 Respondents cross-move to dismiss the petition…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Farrington v. PinckneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Stetson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Luker v. CurtisIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
- Town of Trumbull v. EhrsamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Warren v. ThomasAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Molinari v. BloombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Long Island Pine Barrens Society, Inc. v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Caruso v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Molinari v. BloombergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Townsend v. City of DillonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.