Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Gasparro

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 5, 1977No. 45697PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondents executed a promissory note for legal services payable to T. Eugene Thompson due April 18, 1961. The trial court held that Thompson was entitled to collect the principal amount of the note, attorneys fees, and costs, but limited the recoverable amount of interest. We reverse as to the limitation of interest.

On January 14, 1961, respondents executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,800 payable to Thompson on or before April 18,1961, which they did not pay when due. In February 1962, Thompson commenced an action on the note, together with accrued interest, attorneys fees, costs,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Bourdeaux v. Gilbert Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. General Mills, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. McCormack Ex Rel. McCormack v. Hankscraft Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hilbert v. Conseco Services, L.L.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Burniece v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Schirmer v. Minnesota Higher Education Coordinating Board (In Re Schirmer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  4. Burniece v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Kelley v. BoosalisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API