Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Cook

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 29, 2010No. Case 2:07-cv-1279PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Louis Simmons and Tee and Ell Weight Lifting and Exercise Enterprises, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) bring claims under the patent laws of the United States as set forth in Title 35 of the United States Code, asserting that Defendants John Cook and Evolve, Inc. (“Defendants”) have been and continue to infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,491,607 (“the '607 patent”). Plaintiffs also bring claims under the Lanham Act as set forth in Title 15 of the United States Code, asserting that Defendants have been and continue to commit trademark infringement,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mulch Manufacturing Inc. v. Advanced Polymer Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  2. GS Holistic, LLC v. Wireless & Smoke LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
  3. North American Business Association, LLC v. United Merchant Services Club, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
  4. Roof Maxx Technologies LLC v. HolsingerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  5. Roof Maxx Technologies LLC v. RourkDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API