Legal Opinion
Subway International B v. v. Panayota Bletas
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 22, 2013No. 12-1204UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment is AFFIRMED.
Appellant Panayota Bletas, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s judgment granting Subway International B.V.’s (“SIBV”) application for confirmation of an arbitration award. Ms. Bletas raises three principal arguments: (1) the district court did not have personal jurisdiction over her because she did not receive proper service of process; (2) the arbitrator’s award was barred by res judi-cata; and (8) the arbitration award cannot be confirmed because it violated public…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Linda Hamilton, Individually and as of the Estate of George Hamilton v. Atlas Turner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Datskow v. Teledyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Guerra v. L&F Distributors, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- LPD New York, LLC v. Adidas America, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Ozkaptan v. CitiGroup, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020