Legal Opinion
Bucher & Gibbs Plow Co. v. International Harvester Co. of America
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 25, 1913No. 115PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Equity. Suit by the Bucher & Gibbs Plow Company against the International Plarvester Company of America. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
DAY, District Judge.
This case is a suit charging infringement of the Niesz reissue patent, No. 13,163, of November 1, 1910, relating to disc harrows. The Niesz patent was issued to the Bucher & Gibbs Plow Company, the complainant herein, as the assignee of Prank B. Niesz, the inventor. Original patent No. 916,361, of which the patent in suit is a reissue, was dated March 23, 1909, and the application for the reissue was filed July 19, 1910. The original and reissued patents a.re for the same invention and both for a new type of harrow. The new patent was issued under the provision of Revised…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Kryptok Co. v. Stead Lens Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1913
- Toledo Computing Scale Co. v. Moneyweight Scale Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ohio Rake Co. v. Bucher & Gibbs Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
- Bucher & Gibbs Plow Co. v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Turner v. SpinnerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925