Legal Opinion

Bucher & Gibbs Plow Co. v. International Harvester Co. of America

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1926No. Nos. 4367, 4368PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit at law to recover royalties alleged to be due under an agreement granting to defendant a license under United States reissue patent 13,163 to Frank B. Niesz, assign- or of plaintiff, to make and vend tandem . disc harrows. The patent was adjudged valid as between the parties in Bucher & Gibbs Plow Co. v. International Harvester Co. (D. C.) 211 F. 473. After that adjudication, the license agreement was entered into, which contains a covenant that forbids defendant’s questioning the validity of the patent in a proceeding of this kind. Defendant contends,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ohio Rake Co. v. Bucher & Gibbs Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
  2. Bucher & Gibbs Plow Co. v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Mining Association v. Office of Hearings and AppealsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API