Legal Opinion

Hines v. Easterly

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 2, 1920No. 6212PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

Appellee recovered judgment against appellant in the district court of Robertson county for damages by reason of the killing of two calves, alleged to have occurred through the negligence of appellant. The suit was brought in the justice court, and appealed to the district court, by reason of the fact that the county court of Robertson county had no jurisdiction in such matters. Appellee, in addition to recovering the value of the animals killed, also recovered an attorney’s fee of $20.

The first assignment of error is that article 2178 of the Revised Statutes does not permit a recovery…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Turner v. Cross and Eddy, ReceiversTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. I. & G. N. R. R. Co. v. CockeTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Stringfellow v. BraseltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co. v. SwanTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Lyon v. FilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Clement Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Dunaway v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. BuiceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API