Legal Opinion

Hotaling v. Fisher

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1922No. Appeal, No. 109PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

If the decision on the application to open depended on the contradictory evidence of the plaintiff and defendant alone, the judgment should not have been opened. As a general rule, the court will not open a judgment on the unsupported oath of the defendant where the testimony of the plaintiff is directly contradictory; but where there is corroboration or there are circumstances from which corroborative inferences may be drawn in favor of the defendant, the court will ordinarily open the judgment and submit the question in dispute to a jury: Jenkintown National Bank’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Stockwell v. WebsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Rinesmith v. Peoples' Freight Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. SilveusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. VanScoten v. Botsford & KunesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Keystone Commercial Co. v. Horowitz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1923
  4. Stenporche v. Ivkovich, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API