Legal Opinion

Keystone Commercial Co. v. Horowitz

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided August 28, 1923No. 8306Published

1Opinion of the Court

Monaghan, J.,

On April 21, 1922, Max Horowitz, M. Kon, Max Weiner, Jacob Miller and Mary Horowitz, the defendants, executed a judgment note for $500, payable one day after date, to the Keystone Commercial Company, Incorporated, the plaintiff.

In addition to the usual terms and the warrant of attorney authorizing confession of judgment, the note contained the following stipulation: “And we and each of us do hereby covenant, publish and declare that the sum of $500 to be paid to us by Keystone Commercial Company, Inc., in consideration of this note is intended for andi will be used by each and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gandy v. WeckerlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. ChristianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Clinch Valley Coal & Iron Co. ex rel. Grove v. WillingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Federal Sales Co. v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Croyle v. Cambria Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API