Legal Opinion

United States v. Azat Martirossian

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 7, 2019No. 18-4035; 18-4114PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

Federal courts do not play "catch me if you can." If a defendant refuses to show up to answer an indictment, ignores an arrest warrant, or leaves the jurisdiction, the court may decline to resolve any objections to the indictment in his absence. What is known loosely as the fugitive disentitlement doctrine generally permits a federal court to insist on a defendant's presence in the jurisdiction before it resolves challenges to the criminal charges.

*886 Azat Martirossian, a citizen of Armenia now living in China, refused to answer criminal charges in the Southern District of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Marietta TerabelianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  2. United States v. SindzingreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  3. Brave Optical Inc. v. Luxottica of America Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
  4. Harris v. SowersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  5. Hill v. Chambers-SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API