Legal Opinion

The Ss Berwindglen

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 12, 1937No. 3203PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

88 F.2d 125 (1937)

THE S. S. BERWINDGLEN.

RAWDING

v.

HOOTEN.

No. 3203.

Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

February 12, 1937.

Walter X. Connor, of New York City (Vernon Sims Jones and Kirlin, Campbell, Kickox, Keating & McGrann, all of New York City, and Burnham, Bingham, Pillsbury, Dana & Gould, of Boston, Mass., on the brief), for appellant.

Edmund M. Murray, of Boston, Mass. (Gazan & Caldwell, of New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before BINGHAM, WILSON, and MORTON, Circuit Judges.

WILSON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree in admiralty by the District Court of Massachusetts.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lortie v. American-Hawaiian S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  2. The AlectorDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1920
  3. Anderson v. Whitney-Bodden Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
  4. Rawding v. HootenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
  5. The ConiscliffDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1920

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Petterson Lighterage & T. Corp. v. New York Central R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Barlow v. Pan Atlantic SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  3. Boston Ins. Co. v. Dehydrating Process CoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
  4. McDonough v. Buckeye S. S. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951
  5. Nowery v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API