Legal Opinion
Boston Ins. Co. v. Dehydrating Process Co
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 21, 1953No. 4688PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODBURY, Circuit Judge.
Dehydrating Process Co., as the owner of a tank barge and its cargo of liquid fish, brought this libel in admiralty against Boston Insurance Company and three other underwriters to recover on policies of marine insurance for damage to the barge and loss of its cargo. The only question with which we are concerned on this appeal is whether the admitted loss of the cargo and damage to the vessel were caused by “perils of the sea,” all other questions having been disposed of by concessions or by stipulation.
The barge involved was a rectangular steel vessel 130 feet long, 9…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Petterson Lighterage & T. Corp. v. New York Central R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- J. Aron & Co. v. DannebrogCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Calvin JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A.A. GOMEZ, Warden, and John K. Van De Kamp, Respondents-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Tropical Marine Products, Inc. v. Birmingham Fire Insurance Company of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Lillian Reisman v. New Hampshire Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Ferrara v. A. & v. Fishing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.