Legal Opinion

Vanesch v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 17, 2000No. CA CR 99-1018PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

K.MAX KOONCE, II, Judge.

Appellant was found guilty of .possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver, possession of marijuana with intent to deliver, and possession of drug paraphernalia. He appeals the convictions on the grounds that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his juvenile delinquency adjudication. We affirm the convictions.

On January 21, 1998, appellant was charged with possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver in violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401 (Repl. 1997), possession of marijuana with intent to deliver in violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Slaton v. SlatonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. McGhee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Love v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Byrd v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. OronaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API