Legal Opinion
Claim of Beekman v. W. A. Brodie, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 29, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhitmyer, J.
The claim is that claimant compromised with a third party for his injury, without the written approval of the carrier, and that he thereby lost his right to any deficiency.
The award was for the period from April 20, 1925, to March 12, 1926, or forty-six and four-fifths weeks at $20 per week, and recites that the employer and the carrier are entitled to a credit of $255 received by claimant from a third party. The Board found that claimant had elected to take compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law and that he did not elect to commence and did not commence an action against the third…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Brien v. LodiNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Claim of Woodward v. E. W. Conklin & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Matter of Clow v. B.F. Keith's Fordham TheatreNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Matter of Matta v. . Dennings Point Brick WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Claim of Corigliano v. International Druggist Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Claim of Munro v. L. P. Henryson & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Claim of Stout v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937