Legal Opinion · Dissent

Goldstein v. Goldstein

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1940Published

1DissentConway, J.

There has been certified the following question: Does the complaint herein state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for injunctive relief? The complaint alleges in substance that plaintiff and defendant were married and resided as husband and wife in the city, county and State of New York; that at the time of the commencement of this action and for many years prior thereto both the plaintiff and defendant were residents of the city, county and State of New York and that defendant now has his place of business in the county of New York; that defendant deserted and abandoned…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Krause v. KrauseNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Baumann v. BaumannNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Lowe v. LoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Somberg v. SombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. The People Ex Rel. Crane v. . RyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1855

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API