Legal Opinion

Edmonds Indus. Coatings, Inc. v. Lolley

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 2, 2003No. 2011166PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Roger Dale Lolley died while this appeal was pending. A suggestion of death has been filed in this court, but no substitution of party has been made. The death of a party to an appeal does not abate the appeal. Rule 43, Ala.R.App.P.; Walker v. Bailey, 686 So.2d 304, 305 n. 1 (Ala.Civ.App. 1996).

Edmonds Industrial Coatings, Inc. ("the company"), appeals from a judgment awarding Roger Dale Lolley ("the worker") workers' compensation benefits. We dismiss the appeal.

The facts are not pertinent to our decision except that the worker claimed that he was allergic to paint fumes to which he was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bean v. CraigSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Walker v. BaileyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edmonds Indus. Coatings, Inc. v. LolleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  2. Hollinghead v. Willstaff, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. Mitchell v. ThornleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  4. Edmonds Indus. Coatings, Inc. v. LolleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API