Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Harley

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 10, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

934 S.W.2d 58 (1996)

Ray Dean BURGESS, Plaintiff/Appellant,

v.

Anthony S. HARLEY, Defendant, and

Putnam County Highway Department and Putnam County, A Body Politic, Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville.

July 10, 1996.

Application for Permission to Appeal Denied October 28, 1996.

Ernest C. Onks, Sr., Ronald Thurman, Cookeville, for plaintiff/appellant.

Daniel H. Rader, III, Moore, Rader, Clift & Fitzpatrick, Cookeville, for defendant.

Application for Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court October 28, 1996.

OPINION

KOCH, Judge.

This appeal arises from a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Carvell v. BottomsTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API