Legal Opinion

Cogdill v. Scates

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 14, 1976No. 64PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Chief Justice.

This appeal involves the question to what extent and under what circumstances a party is bound by his own adverse testimony in the trial of his case. This “has been characterized as one of the most troublesome questions in the law of evidence and has been the subject of much diversity of judicial opinion.” 32A C.J.S. Evidence § 1040 (3) (1964). Specifically, the question here presented is: Upon the trial of an action, may a party under no disability who (1) deliberately and unequivocally repudiates the allegations in the pleadings upon which she has based her claim for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harlow v. LeclairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Kanopka v. KanopkaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  3. Hill v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. Alamo v. Del RosarioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  5. Bradshaw v. STIEFFELMississippi Supreme Court · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Green v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Woods v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Capital Resources, LLC v. Chelda, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Booher v. FrueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Jones v. Durham Anesthesia Associates, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API