Legal Opinion
United States v. Couch
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided July 11, 2005No. 6:04-cv-00570PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER 1
KAHN, District Judge.
Before this Court is a motion by Jeremy Couch (“Defendant”) requesting suppression of the physical evidence and statements taken from him on May 14, 2004 as evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
1. BACKGROUND
The Schenectady Municipal Housing Association (“SMHA”) is a federally subsidized housing authority governed by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and subject to Congressional acts, applicable statutes, executive orders, HUD rules and…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Christopher D. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- United States v. DupreeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- State v. BrittinghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Armstrong v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.