Legal Opinion

Pearce v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 30, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from Independence Circuit Court. James W. Butler, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCockrill, C. J.

The question now presented arises upon motion to tax a fee of $20 for the benefit of the prosecuting attorney who successfully conducted this' proceeding in bastardy for the State in the circuit court and here. The statute authorizes the taxing of such a fee upon the affirmance of a judgment of conviction for a misdemeanor. Mansf. Dig., secs. 2469-2471. But bastardy is a civil proceeding, and not a criminal prosecution. Chambers v. State, 45 Ark., 56. “ Indemnity and protection of the counties against the burden of supporting the child, and not the punishment of the father, are the objects…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wimberly v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Belford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Land v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  4. Eveland v. State Use of FossettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API