Legal Opinion

Eveland v. State Use of Fossett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 9, 1934No. 4-3513PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This suit was brought in the name of the State for the use and benefit of Birdie Fossett, to affiliate a bastard child of which she alleges appellant was the father. It was adjudged both in the county court and in the circuit court on appeal that appellant was the father of the bastard child, and he was required by the judgment of the circuit court, pronounced upon the verdict of a jury, to make monthly payments provided for by the statute under which the proceeding was had.

An appeal has been duly prosecuted from that judgment, and for its reversal it is insisted that the court erred in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Van Hook v. HelenaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  2. Wimberly v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Belford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. State v. NeilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mode v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Burks Motors, Inc. v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Suit v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. McFadden v. GriffithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API