Legal Opinion

South Carolina v. Port Royal & A. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina

Decided June 10, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. -On motion to remand. Suit by the state of South Carolina against the Port Royal & Augusta Railway Company to forfeit defendant’s charter.

1Opinion of the Court

SIMOETOH, District Judge.

The complaint in this case was filed in the. court of common pleas for Beaufort county, in the state of South. Carolina. A petition for removal of the cause into this court was filed by the defendant, with .the bond required by law. It is said that the state court refused to grant the order of removal: A trans.c-ript of the record, however, has been filed in this court, and the cause has been docketed here. The present motion is to remand it to the state court. The ground upon which it is based is that the record does not present a case arising under the constitution…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Stone v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Gold-Washing and Water Co. v. KeyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Ames and Others v. State of Kansas Ex Rel. Johnston. Kansas Pac. Ry Co. v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Crehore v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oliver v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900
  2. Town of Westerly v. Westerly WaterworksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1896
  3. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. AsiaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API