Legal Opinion

Paul G. Murgia v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 9, 1971No. 19-35552PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In 1959,' petitioner was found guilty on two counts of violating federal narcotics laws. He also admitted that he was the perpetrator of a prior 1956 federal narcotics offense charged in the in formation. He received ten-year concurrent sentences on each count, the minimum term for second offenders. 21 U.S.C. § 174.

In 1969, petitioner was successful in getting his 1956 conviction set aside on the ground that there had been inadequate compliance with Rule 11, F.R. Crim.P., in accepting his guilty plea. He now seeks to overturn his 1959 conviction and the sentence arising therefrom by way of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paul Garcia Murgia, Pedro Hernandez Ramirez and Joe Ramirez Carpio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. William Lorin Borchert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Fred Stein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. Thomas Patrick Schram v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Edgar Christopher, Jr., and Tommy Gene EveridgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Armando Valenzuela-MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Warren Lonnell HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Jose R. Vargas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. James Lee Argo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API