Legal Opinion

State v. . Jackson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 20, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNoe, J.

There was evidence at the trial of this action, offered by. the State and submitted to the jury by the court, without objection by the defendant, sufficient in its probative force to sustain the verdict that defendant is guilty of rape, as charged in the indictment. This evidence was sufficient to show not only that the crime of rape was committed as alleged in the indictment, but also that the defendant is the man who committed the crime, as is also alleged therein.

The evidence offered by the defendant, and also submitted to the jury by the court, tending to show that defendant is not the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. State v. . DegraffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. State v. . HartsfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. State v. Marsh.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API