Legal Opinion

Gougar v. Timberlake

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1897No. 17,760PublishedCited by 35 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

The question in this case is, have women, nnder existing laws in this State, the privilege of suffrage, or is sex a qualification upon the right to vote for public officers?

The constitution of this State, article 2, section 2,pro-vides that, “In all elections not otherwise provided for by this Constitution, every male citizen of the United States, of the age of twenty-one years and upward,” etc., “shall be entitled to vote,” etc. The statute as to the qualification of electors, section 6192, Burns’ R. S. 1894, is substantially in the language of the constitution cited. It will be observed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. United States v. REESESupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Anderson v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1865
  4. State ex rel. Wood v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  5. State ex rel. Knowlton v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Shaw v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Coggeshall v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State Ex Rel. Attorney-General v. KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API