Legal Opinion

Prewitt v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 2004No. 77A04-0304-CR-197PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

This case illustrates what happens when the State engages in a pattern of withholding exculpatory and material evidence from a defendant prior to trial. Appellant, defendant Nancy Prewitt raises a number of alleged errors following her conviction for the Murder 1 of her husband, William Davies. In particular, Prewitt claims that the following errors occurred: (1) the State improperly withheld certain exeulpa-tory evidence from Prewitt in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963); (2) statistical evidence regarding the probability…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Banks v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Morse v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Hayden v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Richard Vance Hastings v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Ransom v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Anthony D. Moore v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API