Prewitt v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
This case illustrates what happens when the State engages in a pattern of withholding exculpatory and material evidence from a defendant prior to trial. Appellant, defendant Nancy Prewitt raises a number of alleged errors following her conviction for the Murder 1 of her husband, William Davies. In particular, Prewitt claims that the following errors occurred: (1) the State improperly withheld certain exeulpa-tory evidence from Prewitt in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963); (2) statistical evidence regarding the probability…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Banks v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Morse v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Hayden v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Richard Vance Hastings v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Ransom v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Anthony D. Moore v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.