Legal Opinion

Smith v. Finkel

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 22, 1943PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The plaintiff Joseph Smith brought this action to recover damages to merchandise in a store he conducted, caused by a fire alleged to have resulted when a truck owned by the named defendant and operated by his agent, Jacob M. Proseo, also a defendant, ran into another car by reason of the claimed negligence of Proseo. An insurance company, which had paid the plaintiff a substantial sum for his loss by the fire, intervened as a coplaintiff. The trial court gave judgment for the defendants and the plaintiffs have appealed.

The finding, in which no material change can be made, states the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Stevens v. NeligonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Deantonio v. New Haven Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. Butler v. Hyperion Theatre Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  5. Romansky v. CestaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Turner v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  2. Nettleton v. JAMESOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Phillips v. DELTA MOTOR LINES, INC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Rice v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Hawley v. RivoltaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API