Legal Opinion
United Statesex Rel. Grynberg v. Praxair, Inc. & Nielson & Associates, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 28, 2001No. 1:98-cr-00016PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DANIEL, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Nielson & Associates, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed April 6, 2000, and Defendant Praxair, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed April 6, 2000. A hearing on these motions was held March 2, 2001; at that time, I took the motions under advisement. After extensive review of the record, 1 applicable law, and argument of the parties, I find that the motions should be GRANTED.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Procedural Background
1.Plaintiff Jack J. Grynberg (“Gryn-berg”) commenced this action on January 7,1998, as a qui tam…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SchumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Grynberg v. Praxair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States Ex Rel. Reagon v. East Texas Medical Center Regional Healthcare SystemDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- In Re Natural Gas Royalties Qui Tam LitigationDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2006
- Makro Capital of America, Inc. v. UBS AGDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2006