Legal Opinion · Dissent

Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. Curtis Electrical Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1954No. A-4310Published

1DissentJustice Griffin

I am in agreement with the majority opinion insofar as it holds that the building contract and bond fall within the provisions of Article 5160, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes; and the petitioner, not having compiled with the requirement of Article 5160, cannot recover.

I cannot agree that C. E. Curtis is individually liable to petitioner. For him to be liable there must have been a contract — a meeting of the minds — between petitioner and Curtis that Curtis should be liable. Curtis’ liability is predicated solely upon an exchange of letters between the parties.

*122On September 22, 1939,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Summers v. MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Garrett v. International Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. Browne Grain Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Womack v. Dalton Adding MacH. Sales Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Moore Bros. v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API