Legal Opinion

Guentner v. Gnagi

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The letters written by the defendants’ agent, Mr. Scherer, to the plaintiffs do not sustain any finding of fact warranting the conclusion reached by the trial court that “the conduct of the defendants was not such as to estop them from complaining of the plaintiffs’ delay or constitute a waiver of delay.” On the contrary, there was no demand on the plaintiffs to finish the work within a specified and reasonable time by any notice of a determination to have a fixed result. The plaintiffs had every reason to believe that their method, slow and perhaps unsatisfactory as it was, would prove…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. . GoeletNew York Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. LozoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Carey v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Stolper Steel Products Corp. v. Behrens Mfg. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. PumpWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In re First Phoenix-Weston, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API